Today, I had an interesting conversation with Brister Mitten about language channels. I asked him why he didn’t re-enable the language channels.
Brister replied, “I think I should focus on improving the core features first. The language channels are just a part of the overall experience.”
I found that statement a bit odd. Why would someone prioritize core features over what they consider less important? If the language channels are essential for communication, shouldn’t they be given priority?
There’s a clear issue here. The company seems to be making decisions based on what they believe is most important, without considering the needs of their users.
I wonder if there’s a better way to approach this. Maybe we could find a balance between core functionality and feature enhancements. After all, the foundation of any product is crucial.
At the end of the day, I’m not sure what the right choice is. But I hope the company takes this into consideration when making decisions going forward.
Comments
User1: I agree with you. Core features are everything. The language channels are just a side note.
User2: I don’t agree. The language channels are essential for users who rely on them. Without them, the experience becomes harder to navigate.
User3: It’s a matter of perspective. If the company believes they need to focus on core features, then that’s their decision. But I still think the language channels should be considered.